It Happens

Nah u just running bad keep the faith <3

Yawn.

I mean srsly! I was the big aggressor on all streets. I thought he was drawing. Turns out that all he had was an A on a terrible board for him. He calls? What am I doing wrong?

That’s a terrible call by Villain on flop and turn, idk what to tell you lol WP

The big flop bet is just never used here in theory, and I think it’s a bad size in practice too. Villain had to think your line was just full of it I guess - or misread the suit of their cards.

I think the latter is far more likely, but you did make a pretty big mistake by betting so large on that flop. I like the barrel on the turn even less.

Okay, this is good. Please explain why. I need to know this because I’m clueless in this spot. I thought that it was to be aggressive to protect my hand against a draw but in that spot if that’s wrong then I have no idea.

Should I just assume that he had it and check/fold it? You know, walk away from 3 clubs? Play it slower to extract value from a multi-draw (read: suckout heavy) board against a bigger stack that will felt me?

He called 3.3k pre from out of position. I suppose that would likely take hands like 55 A5 out of his range, but perhaps with bigger stack he puts those back in. T9s probably is in his range. Obviously he keeps calling all those big streets they must be in his range. Then of course any club. And by his range, I don;t mean fishy him, I mean a normal conventional player him.

Will post an explanation next,

but having said the above, I’m probably shoving the turn after small betting the flop - which I think looks stronger - but I’d still be going broke here too. I think that applies to every hand you’ve posted so far - I might have played them differently but would have ended up losing more in a bunch of spots.

If you are making mistakes, I don’t think they’re really making a difference, and these aren’t the hands I’d be looking at to improve.

1 Like

There’s several reasons you often want to use very small sizes on monotone flops:

Firstly, what size do you want to use here with AcKc? Your hand is basically invulnerable, and you really want you opponent to hit a straight or worse flush. That applies to basically all your double broadway clubs, so you have a lot of value hands that want to bet small.

Secondly, what do you do with As2s in your opponents’ position facing a 1bb bet? In theory it’s a fold, and it is for most real opponents too. They just have so many hands that can’t continue against any bet on this board.

Thirdly, you’re just not going to get raised by hardly anything other than flushes, and bluff raised basically never. If you’re deeper you probably want to use 1/4 pot instead of 1bb, but I’m not sure it makes much difference. Opponents are very likely to make many more mistakes against a small size than against a large one.

Going large should fold out some middle or bottom pair hands, but you can’t bet large enough to fold out 2-pair+ or anything with decent equity. Therefore you’d never want to use a large size with your top pair/over pair hands, and that’s where you have the advantage - your opponent will almost always be the one with more flushes, straights, two pairs, etc.

In this hand, I’d be betting 1-2bb looking for auto-folds and then either giving up or shoving the turn. The problem with betting so small is it’s hard to read anything into the opponents timing, because they could be deciding if they can call with junk, or raise with a flush.

He limp called from UTG, there is only fishy him. You’re mostly wasting your time trying to range opponents like this, but you can often get a very good read on if they’re weak or strong by using small sizes.

1 Like

I have so much to learn. I look at the board and I look at the betting and I think of the likelihood that he has the stuff to beat me and I get told here that I should stop thinking that and just play to his range. Then I think of his range and I’m told not to bother ranging the opponent, just read if he’s weak or strong.

And you guys want me to play in your league. i wouldn’t last 3 orbits with you guys. : P

Sorry, saying it’s a waste of time to try and range fishy opponents was misleading. You always should be trying to do that - you just shouldn’t be surprised when they show up with hands they’re not supposed to. Juding if they’re weak or strong will help narrow things down a lot, and often is more important.

eg In this hand once they’ve called your pot sized bet, it doesn’t matter if they have a flush, a straight, a draw, 2 pair or top pair, they’ve told you they’re not folding. If you bet small and they snap call, they are usually pretty capped.

I have a request for you - instead of posting hands where you lose, let’s see where you have good hands and don’t get paid. I suspect if you’re making mistakes, it’s far more likely to be in those spots.

Maybe tomorrow. I’m done playing for today. Didn’t think that today could run any worse than yesterday. Just so you know, I’m not posting all of my suckouts today, only a fraction. Most of them felting me.

I know that certain things I’m doing better. I’m wondering if maybe when trying out new things and new strategies takes one’s game down a notch until one hones the new skills needed for the strategy.

1 Like

@napkin_holder personally, I always lose a bunch at first when I’m trying to update my strategy. We’re managing so many variables playing NLHE; trying to tweak something often temporarily throws off the balance.

For example, a couple months ago I tried to tighten up my preflop ranges and instantly became terrible at MTTs. I’d been winning so much with marginal hands, either bluffing or getting there, that I’d forgotten how to win when simply contesting far fewer pots. I ended up going kind of autopilot and playing fit/fold, leading me to just bleed toward the bubble in a lot of tournaments.

In the past couple weeks I’ve been playing the toughest Ring game players at super high stakes, and I’ve mostly overadjusted to their aggression, costing me a couple hundred million chips. There were 4 hands that totaled over 100M in losses where I would normally have taken a more passive line, but I was determined not to let these hyper-aggressive opponents push me around. Oops.