“In a loose, aggressive game, it pays to often be representing a hand somewhat weaker than your actual holding/range. In a tight, passive game, the reverse is true.”
Is this
A) in any sense true, or just wrong/not a thing?
B) a useful oversimplification, or such a blunt instrument as to be ultimately unhelpful guidance?
I would think (1) is usually true since you’d want to maximize the pot. I’m uncertain if (2) would always be true since players catch on pretty quick, that you’re bluffing.