Why I cannot reraise after the BB has all in? not likely that the 36s entered the pot.
The page you were looking for doesn’t exist.
You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.
The link:
You already had the chance to raise on the first circuit of the table. Because the all-in is not enough to be a raise it is considered a call and all you are allowed to do is match that.
Unfortunately, the hand replay does not show your mouse clicks. I think you just hit the wrong button.
None of the links work, but I think I have seen this glitch several times. You bet and it comes around to the BB who raises all in. When the betting comes around to you the normal betting screen does not come up only the call or fold buttons. If there is no other player in the hand this would be correct; however, if there are other players still in the hand I may want to raise to get them out of the pot (especially in a PKO event) but that option is not available. I think that is the glitch the OP is refering to and yes it is annoying.
2 Likes
I have never seen that myself but, yes, that would be annoying as heck. Maybe report this to support so they can investigate. I’ll bet they are able to see player inputs etc. support@replaypoker.com
Peace!
If this is the situation which @Gezaclanismo is referring to then I agree with him that this is another glitch because IMO he should’ve been able to re-raise the all-in re-raise.
But Gezaclansmo should just realize he would’ve lost the main pot anyway because that was just another bad beat situation on RP.
1 Like
Hi @Gezaclanismo , welcome to the forum. I wish I had the answer but as mentioned, the link’s don’t exist. Not possible to determine the answer without the hand’s in question. I also believe this topic should in in the Hand review category.
1 Like
I had enough chips to raise the BB all in.
Probably, but I believe raising that BB all in would be better.
No. I am prepared too raise all in.
I understand what you said wanted to do, and yes… I believe the 3-6 hearts probably would have folded to a pre flop all in.
I do not understand why you did not go all in on the flop. Instead you bet 3995 (slightly more than half the pot) got called (first warning sign) then, with three hearts on the board, you called a 20k (pot sized bet) (second warning sign) on the turn. You had to consider the possibility your aces were no good. I am thinking you were blinded by those beautiful aces, were trying to trap, and got caught. Maybe not. Only you know what you were thinking.
Hand analysis aside (probably incorrect lol), none of that matters if you were not able to re-raise pre flop after the BB went all in. I would report this to support@replaypoker.com
Cheers! 
1 Like
@feelmysins was correct. @Gezaclanismo You can’t re-raise the big blind, because they didn’t make a valid raise. When you raise to 750 (550 more than the 200 to call), the next valid raise would be to 750 + 550 = 1300, but the big blind is all in for less (1165). This isn’t a bug - that’s just the rule.
1 Like
@lihiue @Gezaclanismo @feelmysins
I don’t know about this because this is a NL Hold-em hand. I just rechecked Edge’s AI and this was the response.
You >> (Me)
in no limit holdem is there a limit to the number of raises on each street
Copilot >> (AI)
In No Limit Texas Hold’em, the number of raises allowed on each street is not capped. Unlike fixed-limit games, where there’s a specific limit on the number of raises, no-limit play allows for unrestricted betting and raising.
Here’s how it works:
- Preflop:
- Players can raise as many times as they want.
- The minimum raise is typically the size of the big blind, but players can go all-in if they wish.
- Flop, Turn, and River:
- Again, there’s no maximum limit on the number of raises.
- Players can bet any amount they have in front of them.
- If someone raises, opponents can re-raise (or “3-bet”), and this cycle can continue indefinitely.
In summary, in no-limit hold’em, the sky’s the limit! Players can raise aggressively, bluff, or go all-in strategically. Just be prepared for the adrenaline rush that comes with the freedom of unlimited betting!
Also, there was this response:
- Online Poker:
-
[Online poker games typically follow a more standardized rule, allowing a maximum of 3 raises (which means a total of 4 bets) on each street ]
-
After the initial bet, you can raise twice more during the same betting round.
Remember, these rules ensure an exciting game while preventing excessive betting. So, whether you’re playing in a casino or online, keep an eye on those raises and make strategic decisions
In this hand there weren’t 3 raises made.
I do now remember from years ago limits on re-raises in a (friendly) game were declared but they were declared before the hand was dealt.
Honestly, I’ve never experienced this on RP where someone had the nerve or “balls” to re-raise any of my re-raises.
I don’t think any of that is 100% correct. I’ve never heard of a maximum number of raises, but apparently it can be the case in limit hold’em: Betting and Raising in Poker.
It definitely doesn’t apply for the hand in question though.
The rule for NL Hold’em is that the minimum raise is the equal to the last raise or bet (the big blind counts as the first bet). A player is always allowed to go all-in though, even if they can’t meet the minimum raise. What happens after that could in theory differ site to site, but I believe everyone follows that same rules where an all-in less than the minimum raise is treated like a call. So the limpers in UTG and UTG+1 would both be able to raise, but once they just call, Gezacianismo cannot.
It’s slightly disappointing I couldn’t find anything on Replay about this, but it looks like they’re not alone.
This is only poker site I could find that has an explanation: Re-raise (Rules) - Poker Definition | 888poker, otherwise it’s just forum posts.
I would love to get a definitive answer from staff about this…
I found this:
RRoP (Roberts Rules of Poker) No-Limit Rules:
3. All raises must be equal to or greater than the size of the previous bet or raise on that betting round, except for an all-in wager. Example: Player A bets 100 and player B raises to 200. Player C wishing to raise must raise at least 100 more, making the total bet at least 300. A player who has already acted and is not facing a fullsize wager may not subsequently raise an all-in bet that is less than the minimum bet or less than the full size of the last bet or raise.
1 Like
I agree it would be great to get a response from the staff on this. Ideally they’d add something about it to the website, perhaps here: https://www.replaypoker.com/help/poker (unless there’s a better place I’m not aware of).
Your last post is how I understand the rule, although I have no idea how I learnt that. It could also be read to imply that UTG and UTG+1 wouldn’t be able to raise in this case, but my understanding is that they would, although I’m not very confident on that point. I’d be interested to know exactly