That’s what I said right? Standard algorithm and they also tested the shuffle.
I’ll add arrogant. “There can’t possibly be anything wrong with the way that I play. That’s all the proof that I need.”
And lazy. Won’t crunch any numbers, refuse to dig deeper and do any actual math, refuse all help to actually prove their argument or to improve their own game.
And addicted. Continuing to play a game for years and years and years fully believing that it’s specifically stacked against them.
I’ve said enough here, and the only thing that I feel compelled to add is that I would LOVE to meet any or all of these ‘conspiracy victims’ at the tables if they play as badly as some of the hand examples shown. There is no better feeling than a fish donating chips to my bankroll. I’ve tried to be nice. I’ve tried to be helpful. I’ve tried to teach them the math. They don’t want to improve. They don’t even want the truth. They just want to make excuses for the holes in their games. Fine. Keep crying. Give me your chips. I’ll take them and I won’t feel bad at all. I’ll put them to good use.
Limp KTs UtG, unable to put Villain on a hand, buttluck trips Ks, pot-bet turn with 3/4s of stack to bluff the flush when they think that they’re ahead(!!). Now, I’m not the best expert here but how is this not egregious play by a clueless player (who has been here ELEVEN YEARS!!)??
I’ve tried … for months … it’s a waste. It might be rude to call y’all fish but it’s true, and it’s not nearly so rude as y’all smearing the site as being rigged with zero evidence, so see y’all at the tables FISHIES, and bring lots of chips. I’ll take them. I’m not proud.
yeah I like to play against some of these players. watch them cry when they don’t get rewarded. but but but my 6,2 won online, but not real live poker.
what hand was I supposed to put him on with a min bet? could be doing that with any 2 cards . lets not say how badly pocket 7’s played but jump me I would’ve doubled up if a 7 didn’t hit.
-
I am not whining.
-
I AM winning more chips as long as I play the algorithms, I am doing quite well.
-
The first thing I do is check the ranking of each player on every table I play.
-
After 14 years on this site I know the patterns (and there are many) and I play accordingly.
-
This is not poker, I cannot play like I play in my Friday night games.
-
I only play here for practice and entertainment, the only one making money on here is Replay, and that is okay with me.
-
Don’t be so foolish to claim it is a RNG, because it is definitely not, but that is okay with me.
2 Likes
The problem is that some players, through experience, do arrive at profitable exploits. Maybe you have done so. @Excaliburns for example has won multiple accolades in league play, and I know for a fact that he doesn’t follow “modern poker theory.” He is exploiting his opponents and enjoying commensurate success. More power to him, and to you.
But both he and, evidently, you also mistakenly attribute part of that success to “playing the algorithm/patterns” (Excaliburns calls them “trends”). This is not what is happening; you aren’t exploiting the RNG. You may think you are, but you aren’t. You’re just exploiting the other players at your table.
The patterns are there, repeated over and over and over again, you can call them what you please, but I can call out what the next card will be with astonishing accuracy.
Maybe I am more aware than most because I have a “math” background.
I mostly play the freerolls because I usually leave or throw my chips in the pot when I done.
I don’t care how many chips I have because they are worthless.
Call it what you will really doesn’t matter to me.
2 Likes
If you have a math background, you really should know better.
correct. you’re backing up everything I been saying or trying to say.
1 Like
I suppose some people see it and some people don’t, and then you have the Replay “employees.”
There is so much corruption in this world, does this really matter. There are more important things to be dealt with.
1 Like
Like a roulette wheel, if you pay attention and know “what’s trending”, it will give
you just enough confidence to make the right call.
Hand #1254947141 · Replay Poker (casino.org)
Hand #1252235066 · Replay Poker (casino.org)
Hand #1245169465 · Replay Poker (casino.org)
Hand #1238380254 · Replay Poker (casino.org)
Hand #1222997467 · Replay Poker (casino.org)
(For Entertainment Purposes Only!)
Nothing is ever 100%
Again, using A.I. about regarding your comment of no need to touch Flash when switching to HTML.
Question:
was it difficult to translate or convert a flash program to html
A.I. Answer:
Yes, converting Flash programs to HTML could be challenging, particularly if the program was complex or relied heavily on Flash-specific features. Flash used ActionScript for interactivity, which isn’t directly compatible with HTML. Migrating to HTML often required rewriting the logic in JavaScript, along with implementing animations and graphics in HTML5 and CSS. The complexity depended on the program’s functionality and the extent of custom elements involved.
Additionally, Flash had built-in capabilities for vector graphics and audio that required alternative libraries or frameworks in HTML (like Canvas or Web Audio API). Developers often had to analyze the original program thoroughly and determine which modern tools best replicated the features.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
How did you come up with your comment that there was no relationship between Flash and HTML? It seems like A.I. has a different opinion.
Sounds like both Flash and HTML are programming languages.
They are both programming languages (sort of), but there are 2 separate programs at work when you play on Replay. There’s the client, which runs on your machine (laptop/phone/whatever). That’s what is written in HTML/flash, and what changed. The client is only responsible for drawing what the server tells it to, and for telling the server what actions you have taken.
The server is the second program. That’s running on Replay’s hardware, and that is where all the game logic actually happens. I don’t know what language that’s written in, but you can be fairly sure it’s never been Flash or HTML. It doesn’t have to be the same as the client, because the two are essentially only passing messages back and forth between each other.
The RNG and shuffle live on the server.
30M in 14 years? Doubtful. : P
Just FYI, those AI answers aren’t reliable at all. You shouldn’t use AI as a concierge for information-seeking; at the end of the day it is just a well-trained parrot. Caveat usor!
1 Like
3 posts were merged into an existing topic: The Totally Topic-less Anything Except Complaining Thread
Yup, they are incredibly inaccurate. This is how somehow you get Googles AI telling people to put glue in their pizza to help the cheese stick.
I have tried to help.. the wild man… but he insulated me… because I am not a good speller… and I don’t fell spelling and poker have much in common… I have played 5 years on replay now… played for team pirate about 4 years… in dream weaver league… have a team called the cobra chickens in the barn yard muckers league… I play in the donk’s league… and a few outers… like the Bata testing leauges…I invited… wild pokerdude… to play the American games on replay to see how he can place in a tournament… and he only played 1 game of 60… if a player is so upset playing here… its best to let them be… I cant make people love replay as much as i do…
Your reply doesn’t rule out that the server wasn’t re-programmed also when the Flash conversion took placed.to accommodate the changes.
I’m positive a change has occurred with the RNG and it coincides with the conversion event. I really don’t believe in coincidences, because I’ve found there is always a cause and effect for things occurring.
I agree and whenever the answer doesn’t make sense with my thinking, I’ve asked for clarification and the A.I. has corrected its answer. Or it provided additional info for its response.
I don’t usually accept responses unless it makes some sense with me.
Don’t you notice misspelled words are shown underlined? All you have to do is click the word and the Spell Checker gives you options to correct it or ignore it.
Dude, would you mind providing your WRF% (Total Wins / (Total hands played - Total hands folded) and your PWWS% (Pots Won Without Showdown)? The info is provided on your Statistics page from your drop-down menu.
This was discussed in another thread and I’m just curious about something.
If you do decide to provide them. then my thanks in advance.