specifically, I’m confused what this rule means or why it is important
@Dorkupine, no there is no disadvantage to playing the occasional Sunday game if you normally can play only Wednesdays. Your Sunday Best 9 average will be hurt if you do not play in at least 9 Sunday games, but as you would not have been competing for the Sunday crown in any case, that doesn’t matter. Your Wednesday Best 9 will not be affected in any way by your Sunday play. And your Best 9 Overall will contribute to your Composite Best 9, so if you do better in one of your Sunday appearances than your 9th best Wednesday game, the Sunday play will help boost your Composite board score.
The system is designed to encourage players to play as often as they can, while still allowing players to miss up to 3 games on each weeknight without it harming their Best 9 Average. Yet, if you play more than 9 games, you can only help your average, so you have incentive to play as many games as you can, and you don’t need to consider sitting out games late in the quarter if you’re sitting on a high average and don’t want to risk hurting it by busting early.
Bottom line, play as often as you can, and play your best each time, and you will do the best that you can in the league, just as it should be.
What Badonkidonk meant by that is that a player who plays in fewer than 9 games on Sunday would have their points averaged as though they played 9 games, once 9 have been entered into the books for the quarter on Sunday.
Basically the way it works is like this: Weeks 1-9, your points are summed and divided by the number of games that have been held so far on that board. If you are absent for one of those 9 games, this means that you effectively get your average calculated as though there’s a zero acting as a placeholder for the game you missed.
Once we hit Week 10, players who have perfect attendance will see their Best 9 scores summed and divided by 9, resulting in a Best 9 Average, while players who have missed a game or two will have the final three games of the quarter to make up for the 0.
So if you can make all 12 games, your average will be boosted because you end up throwing out your bottom 3 games. If you miss a game, it’s one of those bottom 3 results that doesn’t count toward your average. If you miss more than 3 games, this will harm your Best 9 average on that board. But missing a Sunday game will not hurt your average on Wednesday, and vice versa, obviously.
But less obviously, if you are looking at the composite board, the 1/week players will have their Best 9 games come all from their weeknight that they play, while players who play 2/week will have their Best 9 overall calculated to make the Composite board average.
Since this means that 2/week players are effectively able to discard their bottom 15 games from their Composite Best 9 average, this should mean that they’ll have a considerable advantage over a 1/week player when it comes to the Composite board, but a very good 1/week player conceivably could still take a high enough average to contend for the Composite board crown, or advancement through Composite board points if they are in one of the lower tiers.
Since the Composite score is also used for purposes of relegation, there’s no detrimental effect to a normally 1/week player playing an occasional off-night game if they are available to do so.
2 Likes
If it is not a bother, can 1 of you kind folks apply this new system to a past quarter so we can all see how the results would be affected. It would help us understand it all better as well.
I thank all who are involved in the remodeling, I can see there was a lot of effort put into this…
3 Likes
We did use previous quarter’s data for testing purposes… I think I still have the draft version of the board with the data still in it. I can copy the tables here and they should display correctly, I’ll try to get to that soon.
The gist of it is that players who benefit most from these changes are very good players who don’t have the best attendance. Players who have great attendance but their average performance was worse fell slightly in their rankings, while players who played at least 9 games on a leaderboard and had a higher average were boosted.
OK, for @JuiceeLoot and anyone else who may be curious, here’s what the standings would have been had we been using the new system in 2019Q4:
Sunday:
| Rank | Prev | Move | Player | Games | Sum9 | Avg9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 1 |
1 | 0 | KirbyMuckIt | 11 | 149,103 | 16,567 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Galak | 10 | 127,800 | 14,200 |
| 3 | 6 | 3 | Seville | 12 | 127,137 | 14,126 |
| 4 | 3 | -1 | JuiceeLoot | 12 | 126,948 | 14,105 |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | nimwin14 | 11 | 126,512 | 14,057 |
| 6 | 4 | -2 | BRICK52 | 12 | 126,484 | 14,054 |
| 7 | 8 | 1 | Gotthejack | 11 | 123,674 | 13,742 |
| 8 | 23 | 15 | elanoftroy | 9 | 117,343 | 13,038 |
| 9 | 7 | -2 | TopSet | 12 | 115,232 | 12,804 |
| 10 | 16 | 6 | puggywug | 12 | 115,108 | 12,790 |
| 11 | 12 | 1 | flashlight_gt | 10 | 113,702 | 12,634 |
| 12 | 9 | -3 | Goldiebear11 | 12 | 110,862 | 12,318 |
| 13 | 10 | -3 | morgan11 | 12 | 109,031 | 12,115 |
| 14 | 11 | -3 | horse-man | 12 | 108,377 | 12,042 |
| 15 | 13 | -2 | mayo_1506 | 12 | 105,993 | 11,777 |
| 16 | 15 | -1 | Theweasle | 12 | 105,857 | 11,762 |
| 17 | 31 | 14 | -BlackWidow- | 10 | 105,823 | 11,758 |
| 18 | 14 | -4 | edjer54 | 11 | 103,700 | 11,522 |
| 19 | 20 | 1 | FatnSassy | 12 | 101,114 | 11,235 |
| 20 | 24 | 4 | midwestjack | 9 | 99,670 | 11,074 |
| 21 | 19 | -2 | barredapollo | 10 | 98,981 | 10,998 |
| 22 | 21 | -1 | hessman | 12 | 97,048 | 10,783 |
| 23 | 18 | -5 | chuckcox | 11 | 97,015 | 10,779 |
| 24 | 17 | -7 | MCcats | 11 | 95,404 | 10,600 |
| 25 | 22 | -3 | Axiom222 | 10 | 90,796 | 10,088 |
| 26 | 29 | 3 | crosby63 | 11 | 86,970 | 9,663 |
| 27 | 26 | -1 | Badonkidonk | 12 | 85,699 | 9,522 |
| 28 | 25 | -3 | tomkat287 | 11 | 83,095 | 9,233 |
| 29 | 32 | 3 | Reesepiece | 6 | 81,408 | 9,045 |
| 30 | 27 | -3 | mikhayla | 6 | 81,266 | 9,030 |
| 31 | 28 | -3 | lovelakeliven | 10 | 80,266 | 8,918 |
| 32 | 30 | -2 |
 tabarry |
8 | 79,463 | 8,829 |
| 33 | 42 | 9 | Oltop | 3 | 64,871 | 7,208 |
| 34 | 33 | -1 | murrayob | 7 | 59,008 | 6,556 |
| 35 | 34 | -1 | crum1850 | 5 | 58,091 | 6,455 |
| 36 | 35 | -1 | hanky14 | 5 | 58,061 | 6,451 |
| 37 | 36 | -1 | Dendit | 5 | 49,926 | 5,547 |
| 38 | 38 | 0 | Justplayin | 6 | 47,448 | 5,272 |
| 39 | 37 | -2 | Junkhead68 | 5 | 47,073 | 5,230 |
| 40 | 40 | 0 | Dorkupine | 4 | 36,258 | 4,029 |
| 41 | 39 | -2 | NolaBruce | 3 | 29,610 | 3,290 |
| 42 | 41 | -1 | re1ayer | 2 | 17,067 | 1,896 |
| 43 | 43 | 0 | rebelburn | 1 | 8,764 | 974 |
| 44 | 44 | 0 | whp0854 | 1 | 8,103 | 900 |
Wednesday:
| Rank | Prev | Move | Player | Games | Sum9 | Avg9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
3 | 2 | edjer54 | 12 | 158,659 | 17,629 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | Goldiebear11 | 11 | 136,625 | 15,181 |
| 3 | 6 | 3 | elanoftroy | 11 | 124,838 | 13,871 |
| 4 | 17 | 13 | Dorkupine | 12 | 120,760 | 13,418 |
| 5 | 2 | -3 | Justplayin | 8 | 120,563 | 13,396 |
| 6 | 5 | -1 | horse-man | 11 | 116,799 | 12,978 |
| 7 | 4 | -3 |
tabarry |
9 | 113,874 | 12,653 |
| 8 | 9 | 1 | Badonkidonk | 12 | 113,030 | 12,559 |
| 9 | 10 | 1 | hessman | 12 | 111,060 | 12,340 |
| 10 | 8 | -2 | mayo_1506 | 11 | 110,350 | 12,261 |
| 11 | 7 | -4 | Seville | 12 | 109,582 | 12,176 |
| 12 | 12 | 0 | puggywug | 12 | 108,415 | 12,046 |
| 13 | 11 | -2 | FatnSassy | 11 | 106,859 | 11,873 |
| 14 | 14 | 0 | KirbyMuckIt | 12 | 105,911 | 11,768 |
| 15 | 16 | 1 | mikhayla | 9 | 105,674 | 11,742 |
| 16 | 22 | 6 | Theweasle | 10 | 105,486 | 11,721 |
| 17 | 23 | 6 | crosby63 | 11 | 105,119 | 11,680 |
| 18 | 27 | 9 | flashlight_gt | 9 | 104,644 | 11,627 |
| 19 | 13 | -6 | JuiceeLoot | 9 | 102,670 | 11,408 |
| 20 | 15 | -5 | whp0854 | 11 | 99,902 | 11,100 |
| 21 | 25 | 4 | GSOPhil | 8 | 98,603 | 10,956 |
| 22 | 18 | -4 | lovelakeliven | 11 | 97,666 | 10,852 |
| 23 | 20 | -3 | hanky14 | 11 | 97,456 | 10,828 |
| 24 | 19 | -5 | Gotthejack | 11 | 96,017 | 10,669 |
| 25 | 21 | -4 | chuckcox | 12 | 94,585 | 10,509 |
| 26 | 24 | -2 | MCcats | 11 | 89,984 | 9,998 |
| 27 | 26 | -1 | Axiom222 | 12 | 88,607 | 9,845 |
| 28 | 29 | 1 | nimwin14 | 7 | 72,211 | 8,023 |
| 29 | 28 | -1 | barredapollo | 8 | 66,893 | 7,433 |
| 30 | 30 | 0 | BRICK52 | 8 | 65,468 | 7,274 |
| 31 | 31 | 0 | morgan11 | 8 | 61,529 | 6,837 |
| 32 | 34 | 2 | Oltop | 4 | 60,044 | 6,672 |
| 33 | 32 | -1 | NolaBruce | 5 | 45,269 | 5,030 |
| 34 | 33 | -1 | crum1850 | 4 | 44,116 | 4,902 |
| 35 | 36 | 1 | Junkhead68 | 5 | 42,955 | 4,773 |
| 36 | 35 | -1 | murrayob | 3 | 33,071 | 3,675 |
| 37 | 37 | 0 | Reesepiece | 2 | 28,554 | 3,173 |
| 38 | 38 | 0 | -BlackWidow- | 4 | 24,791 | 2,755 |
| 39 | -39 | midwestjack | 1 | 14,231 | 1,581 |
Composite:
| Rank | Prev | Move | Player | Games | Sum9 | Avg9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
1 | 0 | edjer54 | 23 | 184,003 | 20,445 |
| 2 | 3 | 1 | KirbyMuckIt | 23 | 181,655 | 20,184 |
| 3 | 4 | 1 | elanoftroy | 20 | 175,939 | 19,549 |
| 4 | 2 | -2 | Goldiebear11 | 23 | 173,445 | 19,272 |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | Seville | 24 | 161,467 | 17,941 |
| 6 | 11 | 5 | puggywug | 24 | 155,416 | 17,268 |
| 7 | 6 | -1 | JuiceeLoot | 21 | 152,947 | 16,994 |
| 8 | 9 | 1 | flashlight_gt | 19 | 151,535 | 16,837 |
| 9 | 8 | -1 | Theweasle | 22 | 150,877 | 16,764 |
| 10 | 7 | -3 | horse-man | 23 | 147,361 | 16,373 |
| 11 | 15 | 4 | Gotthejack | 22 | 145,667 | 16,185 |
| 12 | 12 | 0 | hessman | 24 | 143,570 | 15,952 |
| 13 | 13 | 0 | nimwin14 | 18 | 143,068 | 15,896 |
| 14 | 10 | -4 | mikhayla | 15 | 141,689 | 15,743 |
| 15 | 14 | -1 | Justplayin | 14 | 136,568 | 15,174 |
| 16 | 16 | 0 | BRICK52 | 20 | 136,139 | 15,127 |
| 17 | 18 | 1 | FatnSassy | 23 | 135,778 | 15,086 |
| 18 | 17 | -1 |
tabarry |
17 | 129,791 | 14,421 |
| 19 | 20 | 1 | Galak | 10 | 127,800 | 14,200 |
| 20 | 21 | 1 | mayo_1506 | 23 | 125,791 | 13,977 |
| 21 | 41 | 20 | Oltop | 7 | 124,914 | 13,879 |
| 22 | 19 | -3 | Dorkupine | 16 | 124,890 | 13,877 |
| 23 | 22 | -1 | hanky14 | 16 | 122,013 | 13,557 |
| 24 | 25 | 1 | crosby63 | 22 | 121,288 | 13,476 |
| 25 | 23 | -2 | Badonkidonk | 24 | 121,215 | 13,468 |
| 26 | 24 | -2 | Axiom222 | 22 | 117,131 | 13,015 |
| 27 | 28 | 1 | morgan11 | 20 | 115,957 | 12,884 |
| 28 | 26 | -2 | MCcats | 22 | 115,943 | 12,883 |
| 29 | 29 | 0 | TopSet | 12 | 115,232 | 12,804 |
| 30 | 27 | -3 | chuckcox | 23 | 115,175 | 12,797 |
| 31 | 30 | -1 | barredapollo | 18 | 113,690 | 12,632 |
| 32 | 34 | 2 | Reesepiece | 8 | 109,962 | 12,218 |
| 33 | 31 | -2 | lovelakeliven | 21 | 109,921 | 12,213 |
| 34 | 36 | 2 | midwestjack | 10 | 107,112 | 11,901 |
| 35 | 40 | 5 | -BlackWidow- | 14 | 106,207 | 11,801 |
| 36 | 32 | -4 | crum1850 | 9 | 102,207 | 11,356 |
| 37 | 33 | -4 | whp0854 | 12 | 101,432 | 11,270 |
| 38 | 35 | -3 | GSOPhil | 8 | 98,603 | 10,956 |
| 39 | 37 | -2 | murrayob | 10 | 85,875 | 9,542 |
| 40 | 38 | -2 | Junkhead68 | 10 | 83,455 | 9,273 |
| 41 | 39 | -2 | tomkat287 | 11 | 83,095 | 9,233 |
| 42 | 42 | 0 | NolaBruce | 8 | 74,879 | 8,320 |
| 43 | 43 | 0 | Dendit | 5 | 49,926 | 5,547 |
| 44 | 44 | 0 | re1ayer | 2 | 17,067 | 1,896 |
| 45 | 45 | 0 | rebelburn | 1 | 8,764 | 974 |
We did not use data from the lower tiers for testing purposes, so I can’t easily provide the what-if for Silver or Bronze.
1 Like
REPLY TO JUICEELOOT
Great suggestion and you’re right, “there was a lot of effort put into this” by puggywug. He had to do a lot of testing of several different methods to convince me that an average-points system was better than a total-points system. At the tables sometime, just ask him how many different systems we tested during the past month. We should all thank him, because I can be pretty stubborn when I think that I’m right…even when I’m not!
3 Likes
See what I mean? LOL
And, for good measure, here’s a comparison table that I worked up, showing the Actual 2019Q4 Composite and the Experimental 2020Q1 Composite leaderboards with 2019Q4 data, side by side, with diffs:
The “diff” number is for the Row in the New Comp column, and if it’s a positive value it means that the new system boosted the player in the final rankings, while a negative number means that they would have ranked lower in 2019Q4 had this system been in effect.
| # | New Comp | PPG | # | Actual 3Q Comp | diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | edjer54 | 20445 | 1 | edjer54 | 0 |
| 2 | KirbyMuckIt | 20184 | 2 | KirbyMuckIt | 0 |
| 3 | elanoftroy | 19549 | 3 | Goldiebear11 | 4 |
| 4 | Goldiebear11 | 19272 | 4 | Seville | -1 |
| 5 | Seville | 17941 | 5 | puggywug | -1 |
| 6 | puggywug | 17268 | 6 | horse-man | -1 |
| 7 | JuiceeLoot | 16994 | 7 | elanoftroy | 2 |
| 8 | flashlight_gt | 16837 | 8 | mayo_1506 | 8 |
| 9 | Theweasle | 16764 | 9 | JuiceeLoot | 5 |
| 10 | horse-man | 16373 | 10 | hessman | -4 |
| 11 | Gotthejack | 16185 | 11 | Gotthejack | 0 |
| 12 | hessman | 15952 | 12 | FatnSassy | -2 |
| 13 | nimwin14 | 15896 | 13 | Badonkidonk | 5 |
| 14 | mikhayla | 15743 | 14 | Theweasle | 11 |
| 15 | Justplayin | 15174 | 15 | chuckcox | 14 |
| 16 | BRICK52 | 15127 | 16 | flashlight_gt | 3 |
| 17 | FatnSassy | 15086 | 17 | crosby63 | -5 |
| 18 |
tabarry |
14421 | 18 | nimwin14 | 5 |
| 19 | Galak | 14200 | 19 | BRICK52 | 13 |
| 20 | mayo_1506 | 13977 | 20 | MCcats | -12 |
| 21 | Oltop | 13879 | 21 | Axiom222 | 12 |
| 22 | Dorkupine | 13877 | 22 | lovelakeliven | 4 |
| 23 | hanky14 | 13557 | 23 |
tabarry |
5 |
| 24 | crosby63 | 13476 | 24 | morgan11 | -7 |
| 25 | Badonkidonk | 13468 | 25 | mikhayla | -12 |
| 26 | Axiom222 | 13015 | 26 | Dorkupine | -5 |
| 27 | morgan11 | 12884 | 27 | barredapollo | -3 |
| 28 | MCcats | 12883 | 28 | hanky14 | -8 |
| 29 | TopSet | 12804 | 29 | Justplayin | 2 |
| 30 | chuckcox | 12797 | 30 | -BlackWidow- | -15 |
| 31 | barredapollo | 12632 | 31 | TopSet | -4 |
| 32 | Reesepiece | 12218 | 32 | Galak | 4 |
| 33 | lovelakeliven | 12213 | 33 | Oltop | -11 |
| 34 | midwestjack | 11901 | 34 | whp0854 | 1 |
| 35 | -BlackWidow- | 11801 | 35 | midwestjack | -5 |
| 36 | crum1850 | 11356 | 36 | Reesepiece | 1 |
| 37 | whp0854 | 11270 | 37 | crum1850 | -3 |
| 38 | GSOPhil | 10956 | 38 | GSOPhil | 0 |
| 39 | murrayob | 9542 | 39 | tomkat287 | 1 |
| 40 | Junkhead68 | 9273 | 40 | murrayob | 1 |
| 41 | tomkat287 | 9233 | 41 | Junkhead68 | -2 |
| 42 | NolaBruce | 8320 | 42 | NolaBruce | 0 |
| 43 | Dendit | 5547 | 43 | Dendit | 0 |
| 44 | re1ayer | 1896 | 44 | re1ayer | 0 |
| 45 | rebelburn | 974 | 45 | rebelburn | 0 |
As can be seen, many players end up in the same place under both systems. And many others were displaced only by 1-2 places, whether up or down. But there were a few players for whom the new system would have made a considerable difference in their ranking.
The players who moved the most were players who had good averages and played in at least 9 games, but missed too many for their points total to be high in a sum-based ranking, while a few players who had high attendance, but their average PPG was more toward the middle of the pack, slid down a few positions in the rankings.
THANK YOU FOR THE DATA PUGGYWUG
Poker players are numbers freaks, right?
So I want us all to take a little more time to digest all of this data. Therefore, the leaderboards will be posted later on Thursday. Since this was the first tournament of the quarter, everybody should know where they stand anyway. There is an interesting statistic coming from Wednesday’s tournaments though. Guess how many of the Golden Donks tournament top 4 finishers were Silver Donks just 10 days ago. And guess how many of the Silver Donks tournament top 3 finishers were Bronze Donks just 10 days ago.
Tha thar is sum “braying rights” tha is…fer sher!
1 Like
I’m real glad you pointed that out. At the final table in the silver league, 4 of 6 were bronze donks last quarter and the final three were bronze donks last quarter. Props to pokerrick, CaptK8 and kev for being the top 3 and pokerrick for his impressive win. Good luck to all Donks for a great quarter.
One thing missed under accomplishments for last quarter was the formation of the Donks Team and participation in the League Challenge. Many different players tried out the format and some dropped out along the way. But we now have a solid, experienced team going forward for 2020: boyd2, ChicagoSerbs, Theweasle, MCcats, 12beat22, diesel313, sugarblossom, Goatsoup and faceblue. We’ll give it our best this quarter! Go Donks!
I might also add as an accomplishment was the development of the Donk avatars we could all unload - and many have. I’m not sure who to thank for that - but it has really made us noticed on the RP site and enhanced our sense of togetherness.
1 Like
Good stuff and excellent alteration to the format.
Cheers-
AXIOM222
1 Like
REPLY TO MCcats
Team Poker -
Oops. Thank you, MCcats. We overlooked the Donks Team Poker Achievements. You have taken it to a whole new level. Thanks for making it happen. GO DONKS!
Avatar and Crowns -
After spending a few minutes researching our past Forum posts, we have confirmed that our brand Donk avatar idea was actually originally posted by ALCHAP65 in early July, so we claimed it as an accomplishment of the 3rd quarter. The crowns, however were introduced in the 4th quarter. Flashlight_gt has been helping us with them both ever since. BTW any member is entitled to use our brand Donk avatar as their Replay profile photo, but a championship crown is only awarded to the winner of each quarterly Leaderboard. Simply send your avatar request to Badonkidonk to get the link with the instructions of how to download it.
REPLY TO BADONKIDONK
DONK AVATAR
While I may have been the first one to post the idea of BRANDING the Donk League, it was not my idea alone. I have shared in the past, and will share again, here: The idea first came about when several Donk League members were at a table and somebody said it would be neat if we could know who all were part of our League, by some identifying picture or emblem. I know that Flashlight_gt was part of that group. And when i proposed the idea to Badonkidonk, he liked it too. From that point on Flashlight_gt began to develop the avatar that we now use. SO – MANY THANKS TO all those who had input into the idea – AND MANY THANKS TO Flashlight_gt for his development and work on the Avatar that we use today!!!
1 Like
REPLY TO ALCHAP65
Thank you for elaborating, ALCHAP65. You are being modest by downplaying the importance of taking action and submitting the idea. If you want, we’ll not mention your name in relation to this excellent league improvement. It’s just that this is a great example of how a simple thought by a Donk or two, can germinate and lead to a message or post and eventually become a great improvement for our leagues.
We want to encourage more ideas to be posted here or submitted by private messages. This league is infinitely better than ever originally conceived and it is because of the creative minds of our members. This is not MY LEAGUE. This is OUR LEAGUE. That’s the reason I most always say “we” or “our” instead of “me” or “my”. So keep the ideas coming. We can always keep the originator of the idea anonymous if so desired.
NEW NOMINEE
Emmerdeur (ranked 396) has been nominated by chuckcox to be the newest member of our Bronze Donks League.
As usual, if an existing member knows of any reason why this nominee should not be inducted into our league, please message me or post here in our Stables. Otherwise, they will be inducted in time to play in our league tournament on January 8, 2020.
If you have a friend who wants to join our league, simply send me their name and we’ll take it from there…
If anyone else is interested in learning more about our league, post here or send a friend request to Badonkidonk.
Hey Hey all! I want to start off by apologizing for pulling a Houdini for the last couple months. I want to assure you it wasn't apathy, I was dealing with something. However, now that should be relegated to the past so I intend on finishing this quarter the way I started last quarter, terrificly.
I like the idea that was proposed about having a championship type tourny. However, I don't think it should be every quarter rather once per year. It just seems like, while we do have divisions, we also have a set of winners for each of those. if it was not done every quarter then there would be variances to take into account. People will have moved up or down a level, different players would finish ahead of each other, it would give us a chance to determine an overall winner.
Of course, I am horrendous at math so its possible I have no idea what I'm talking about :rofl:
PS - I wish everyone (& their families) a Happy & Healthy New Year filled with luck, laughs, and love
XP
LEADERBOARD UPDATES AFTER OUR TOURNAMENTS ON JANUARY 1, 2020
First, click on the bold blue lettering below to view all 3 leaderboards for that league.
Then click on the LeaderBoard tab at the bottom of your screen.
GOLDEN DONKS - BADONK’S MTT CCXVIII
GOLDEN DONKS - BADONK’S MTT CCXIX
GOLDEN DONKS - BADONK’S MTT CCXX
Congratulations to Team Donk on winning their first match! It was a great game all around, lots of fun. Everyone played well. boyd2 and I cheered on our teammates scoring points at the final table: sugarblossom, ChicagoSerbs, 12beat22 and diesel313. If you are interested in team play and can commit to some afternoons we still have room for a few subs. Let me know. GO DONKS!!!