it must bother you so much, because you keep posting hand after hand how you lost daily
1 ~ I donât cry over it. (yes, you do)
2 ~ I also post many hands where I win.
I said, Iâm not crying. just stating facts
sounds like an unlucky streak, ask yourself; would RP single you out for defeat?
when constantly unlucky, ill nit it for a while
Also; 36m chips?, why not play the 50k mttâs, youâll still see crazy, but less
But nothing that you say is true. ; )
you know, Iâd like to play higher stake tournaments, but with the way hands play out for me, no way Jose . Iâve tried high stakes ring games go after missions. lost 5 million because of hands.
yeah ok
so how does it display above the cards what players have if dealing program doesnât know what anyone has? doing missions. how does it know that I was dealt A of spade if it doesnât know what I have?
How does it know how anyone wins a hand if it doesnât know what anyone has? OF COURSE the server knows what you have, D-UH!!. Clearly, you donât understand coding and are (deliberately to support your dead thesis in order to prove to yourself that you never lose by playing badly, only by luck) confusing code with rng.
If you think that Replay or any other poker site rigged based on this bum thesis, then every computer game ever made (except chess and draughts) is rigged. Iâd explain further but it is a waste of time on you.
Keep yapping and crying.
but replay and others have said rng/dealing program doesnât know what anyone has. yet it needs to know to be able to display everything and reward missions
Imagine your sitting in a room and someone asks you to shuffle a deck of cards and record the position of every card in the deck. They then take that deck and deal out a hand of poker. Do you know what everyone got? No, because you donât know what variant they are playing, how many players there are, or where anyone is seated.
The dealer could be blind in this game and still know what everyone has by just asking you what cards where at specific positions in the deck. You can do your job without ever knowing what anyone has.
Thatâs essentially how the site works. The rng is used to shuffle a deck of cards, and that deck is then used to play a hand of poker. Nothing needs to be known about the game to shuffle the deck, and the deck is fixed before play starts.
the difference between dealing program and human dealing is that dealing program knows what it dealt to everyone.
A human dealer canât award the hand or bonuses without seeing what people have, I donât see a difference here at all, but even if I grant you that there is, how does that change anything?
How a hand plays out is completely determined by the deck given to the dealer/program and the actions of the players.
exactly. a human has to see cards award the winning hand or bonus. if a player folds the dealer has no clue what their cards were. if I folded a hand that I was dealt A of spade, I still get rewarded that mission. now how can I be rewarded that mission if it wasnât shown? again dealing program knows I was dealt A of spade to reward me the chips for that mission
Sure, but it doesnât need to know until after the hand is over. If there were missions in live poker then youâd have to show your folded cards too. Look at this from the other direction though, how would anything change if a human dealer did know everyones cards?
youâre not understanding that I donât have to show I was dealt a A of spade to be rewarded the mission. live game well I would have to stay in all the way to river and then flip my cards over to be rewarded the mission
just like mission that says you have to have a pair on the flop. meaning, I just have to see a flop and have a pair. I can fold at any point during rest of the hand. I still get rewarded for that mission. nobody else at table knows I had a pair, but dealing program sure does. in person, I would have to stay in till river and flip my cards over to be rewarded. if I fold and cards go into the much, then I canât be rewarded for having a pair on flop
If a live game wanted to implement missions, then cards wouldnât go directly into the muck. Where getting way off track here though. The important point is that these 2 things happen:
A) deck of cards is shuffled
B) hand of poker is played with that deck
and that nothing about B affects A, and there are no choices for a dealer, human or otherwise to make in B. If there are no choices they can make then it doesnât matter what information they have.
ok again though in live, the cards would have to be flipped to confirm I had whatever for mission.
online with replay, I can fold at any giving time and be rewarded. so who is confirming I had whatever to get mission? nobody but the program. program has to know what my cards are.
program has to know what you have to display what type of hand you got above the cards
its not hard to understand this
Of course the program has to know what your cards are at some point. Thatâs so obvious thereâs no reason to state it unless you trying to imply that it has some other effect. What Iâm saying is that there are no implications to this. ie. If a human dealer looked at everyones cards after the hand is over to award missions, what would that change? What changes if thereâs a human dealer but thereâs card readers and/or an automated shuffle machine?
dealing program knows what it dealt to everyone. so program can deal exactly what it wants to to create action or reward bad plays. how is it that everyone folds but the one player for whatever reason decides that their crap hand is good here and call or even go over the top and shove all in with 2,9 and crack not 1, but 2 pocket pairs.
If I played 2,9 like that player did, I guarantee I wouldnât win the hand. I know because , Iâve tried to play like that.
If weâre talking about outright cheating, then sure, but you mentioned the RNG initially, and clearly if theyâre just picking the cards they want, a RNG canât be involved.
Iâm confused as to what your hypothesis is though. That Replay always rewards bad plays except when you make them?