The fairness debate

I don’t understand why replay poker, a free website that doesn’t take money unless you buys chips would change its algorithm to be bad beats for everyone. I’m not an experienced coder, but Ive coded enough to know how hard it would be to make it so that there was just enough combinations for each hand so that it wasn’t that obvious that it was rigged but rigged enough to be rigged. Those calculations would be hundreds of times harder than if you just did a random number generator for each hand which is very simple. What is the replay team getting out of it? They dont want to lose their honor of being a fair site and that is a risk much worse than trying to generate action at a free poker table. I would ask someone to do a few thousand or so hands (which is probably not enough but if it was rigged it would start to show) but puggywug already did this on another forum and it showed this site is completely random! Here is the link right here: