There aren’t patterns as in ones you can see coming. But when you see trips come up on the flop 5 times in under two hours, its stuff like that I am talking about.
I think the use of the word patterns is incorrect and confusing people. You’re talking about seeing low probability hands occurring more frequently than expected or should be occurring.
1 Like
so how many hands were dealt in all during those two hours?
assume an average of 1000 players seated and 75 hands per hour 2 hours of play consists of 150,000 hands. trips in the flop 5 times in two hours (at the same table I assume??) not really all that unusual.
could you please provide hand numbers for verification?
Get together 1000 people, have them all flip a coin and everyone who gets tails is out. Repeat until there is one person left. That person has flipped heads about 10 times in a row (100%).
Now do that experiment 1000 times. Every single time the experiment was done (100% of the time), somebody will have flipped heads about 10 times in a row (100%).
If you use the same group of people each time, it will probably happen to some more than once. The point being that it may or may not happen to any one individual (you), but it WILL happen to someone 100% of the time.
The fact that I was at the table for it coming out 5 times is the crazy part. It happening 5 times isn’t that crazy. But it happens ALL the time. Again, digital RNG’s are not truly random and I do not care I’ll play here anyway.
Nah I’m not confused. I see a lot of the same outcomes in similar situations and it could be coincidence. But I really don’t care either way it’s free poker.
They’re random enough to be indistinguishable from truly random in this context.
I think you’re misunderstanding my post because I was stating the use of the word pattern is incorrect in this context. And I don’t believe in coincidences; everything is a cause-and-effect result.
What is the cause of someone flipping heads ten times in a row?
For some reason your question has come to me. I didn’t write that post it was @das32343 see post 83 above.
I was referencing this:
(just in the context of @das32343 's hypothetical)
That would just be the result of a probability calculation which means it should be very unlikely.
“There are NO patterns, people. Give it up. You’ll enjoy life more.” - napkin_holder
Well, I’m enjoying Replay Poker more, and for someone to suggest consistently
otherwise, all I have to say is whenever you get dealt a pair with a 96 in Omaha Hi Lo,
think of me and bet a little more.
It does give one more confidence, so it does work even against very highly rated players.
Hand #1261880028 · Replay Poker (casino.org)
The top tier players are outplayed by Excaliburns, using what you say doesn’t exist!
1 Like
guys want example of a pattern. well here you go. just played a tourney
this hand no 2’s what so ever.
pocket 2’s
very next hand. how about that a 2 right on flop. A, Q would’ve looked real good on hand above
2 on flop
very next hand. how about that a Q on flop. been real good for A,Q
Q on flop
get pocket 5’s. no 5’s at all
55
very next hand I get 9,K gee that would’ve worked well on previous hand, but of course not 1, not 2, but 3 5’s hit board
9K
very next hand. once again 2 9’s hit the flop . 9K would’ve worked well here too
4,Q
I can play all day long and keep showing how previous hand or next hand my cards would’ve been golden. this happens every day. 2 queens on board and I’ll say to myself, I bet a get dealt a Queen next hand. sure enough, I get dealt a Queen.
its not 100%, but this stuff does happen a good majority of the time.
1 Like
LOL…and the band played on. 
Replay poker is 100% RNG legit. 3rd party verified and dignified straight as an arrow. Plausible deniability is sweet.
1 Like
Just imagine roulette signage adapted to a poker hand.
Omaha Hi Lo
Pair w/96
W
W
…L
W
…L
W
W
W
W
1 Like
Yeah, who would have thought that you’d hit more often having 15 cards to make your hand instead of just 5 :). Two of the cards you need are also in your hand for the board that counts, so your hand is more than twice as likely to be good on the prior or next board vs the current one.
You’re going to drive yourself crazy if you keep thinking about how good your hand would have been or the last board.
these are patterns. happen everyday
1 Like
The certification doesn’t give Replay plausible deniability - if they’re advertising an RNG that they’re not using, that puts them on the hook for outright fraud.
If your suggesting that an RNG could pass the certification tests and still produce patterns that a person could detect, I’d love to hear your explanation as to how. Also, all digital cryptography would be useless if that was the case.
Snore…
1 Like
Some people live in a world full of rainbows and unicorns, the rest of us know when money is involved, there is corruption.
2 Likes